I was asked the following question a few months back during my weekly “Ask Anything Wednesday” feature on my Instagram:
“Can you help me with 1 Timothy 2:11-15? Does it indicate subordination of women? That doesn’t seem to align with the rest of the Bible?”
First of all, major kudos to the lady who asked this question, as she already understands that a subordination of women does not align with the Bible’s teachings as a whole. That is a very important first place to start, because Scripture is to be used to interpret Scripture. We know from prior study that the Bible itself does not teach that women are subordinate. Therefore, this passage in 1 Timothy cannot be teaching that, either.
Now on to the passage itself!
11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. 12 And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. 15 Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.
A Lack of Education
In the time and culture in which Paul was writing, women were not being taught or trained theologically. They were not allowed to sit at the feet of the Rabbi to learn from him, right alongside the men (which makes Jesus’ treatment of Mary in Luke 10 so beautiful and revolutionary!) To teach a woman theology was frowned upon, and yet the first thing we see in this passage from 1 Timothy is that Paul WANTS the women to learn. That is huge! Paul is certainly no chauvinist, despite what some might claim. – link to women in the ministries of post
So, first, here in verse 11, we have the Apostle Paul making the revolutionary proclamation that women are now to not only be allowed to learn theology, but are to be encouraged to do so. This amazing development, combined with the salvation and freedom women are finding in the good news of the Gospel, is leading to a great excitement among them (rightfully so – they are being respected and raised up as never before in this era!) As they get more and more excited, however, a problem begins to arise – the same problem we see Paul write about in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35,
The women should be silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak, but are to submit themselves, as the law also says. 35 If they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home, since it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.
Chaos in the Churches
There are two things happening here: women are wanting to learn, and women are wanting to teach, but there are also two subsequent problems taking place: these women are wanting to teach, but they have not first learned, and they are wanting to learn, but they are becoming disruptive in the church service in their attempts to do so.
The larger context of 1 Corinthians 14 finds Paul addressing the chaos, commotion, and lack of order found in the early church services – people are speaking in tongues with no interpreters present, women are calling out in the middle of the service asking questions, and there is no semblance of order, peace, or the quiet and calm required for people to truly learn.
This is clearly why Pauls says in 1 Corinthians 14 that women are not to speak in the church service (we will see more on that specific topic in a moment), as well as why he tells them to learn in silence in 1 Timothy 2:11.
Now we move on to 1 Timothy 2:12, “And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.”
Women Teaching Men – a Biblical Concept!
The issue at hand here is not whether or not Paul believes that it is appropriate for women to teach men (we will see in a moment that God ordained women to do just that throughout the Word, and Paul did, as well!). The issue at hand here is that because these particular women had never before been taught proper, orthodox doctrine, they were currently unfit to teach others. By becoming the teachers, these uneducated women would have led a lot of people astray. That is what you have Paul prohibiting here.
What you do not have is Paul prohibiting women from ever teaching men at all – if he were, he would be going against the rest of the Bible and even his very own writings elsewhere.
We know this because in Romans 16, for example, Paul praises woman after woman for co-laboring with him in the ministry. One of these women is Junia, who he describes as being “well known” among the apostles (see Romans 16:7). Another woman Paul mentions by name and publicly praises is Priscilla, a woman whom Luke writes about in Acts 18:26, where he points out that Priscilla and her husband Aquila corrected the evangelist Apollos’ false doctrine.
Allowing Scripture to Interpret Scripture
When studying the Word as a whole to better understand Paul’s true meaning in 1 Timothy 2:12, we come to clearly see God using women to teach men in the Old Testament, as well. As I have pointed out before, God specifically chose a woman named Huldah (who was a prophetess and prophesying at the very same time as the more well-known prophet, Jeremiah), to be the one He sent King Josiah and his men to for them to learn from (see 2 Kings 22:13-15 and 2 Chronicles 34:21-23).
What is so notable about the example of God specifically choosing to send King Josiah and his men to a woman is that, when you read the passage, these men were in need of someone to correctly understand, interpret, and teach them the newly-discovered book of the law (which scholars tend to think was Deuteronomy). God was literally tasking this woman, Huldah, with teaching men the Word of God. That is precisely what prophets do- proclaim the Word of the Lord, and other female prophets throughout the Word include Deborah, Miriam, Joel’s daughters, Philip’s daughters, and Anna.
Allowing Paul to Interpret Paul
In addition to the Word as a whole providing us with a beautiful picture of women freely teaching men the Word of God (and vice versa, of course!) Paul, in 1 Corinthians 11, sheds further light on what his actual intended meaning was in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 14. Paul writes, in 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 these words, “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head. But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, for that is one and the same as if her head were shaved.“
The greater context of this chapter (and then chapter 14, as well, as mentioned above!) shows that Paul is referring to how things are to take place in a church gathering, while the phrase “every woman who prays or prophesies” reveals that Paul is assuming that it will be normative and expected, in fact, for women to do both of these things. Through both the Old and New Testaments, both, it is portrayed as normal for men to teach women and for women to teach men. Therefore, that practice is clearly not what is being prohibiting in 1 Timothy 2:12.
So what exactly is being prohibited in this 1 Timothy verse? Well, first of all, Paul is prohibiting uneducated, unqualified women from teaching men – because that would naturally lead to falsehood and perhaps even heresy. But another interesting thing to note in this verse that will enable us to better understand Paul’s point is his use of the specific Greek word he chose that has been translated “authority” in this verse. It is not the typical word he uses for “authority”. In fact, he uses this particular Greek word only this one time in the entire New Testament, and it means quite a bit more than simply “authority”.
This Greek word is authenteō, and literally means:
-
one who with his own hands kills another or himself
-
one who acts on his own authority, autocratic
-
an absolute master
-
to govern, exercise dominion over one
Women More Likely to be Deceived?
2 For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. 3 But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he who comes preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or if you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted—you may well put up with it!
Historical Context
Saved in Childbirth?
15 Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.
Thank you for this post! I especially like how you used the phrase “secular feminism” because many times the world does and says the wrong things and call it “feminism.” Looking at another person’s explanation of this passage eased my anxieties and helped me to understand a bit better. Again, thank you.
Probably this article was written by a woman. But u r wrong. If people wrestle with Scripture that is so clear, what will happen if they come across books like Daniel and Revelation?
It is the woman that was deceived, then Adam fell. This church of Laodicea which means people’s rights explains exactly what is going on. This explains why Christian marriages are failing.
2 Timothy 3:1-7 KJV
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
Thank you for your interesting interpretation. So important to check our cultural bias against the rest of scripture. I have another interpretation for this verse: it has been my experience that after incredible trauma, I experienced giving birth and loving and being loved by my baby son, as a kind of salvation. God saved my life and sanity by blessing me with this pure little angel, my son (now 16) was and is to this day my greatest joy and sunshine, my healing: he ‘saved’ me. God saved me through childbirth from despair by putting this baby in my life. Today I heard another woman use exactly those words. She shared how she was sexually abused as a little child, gang-raped as a young woman, but then by a miracle she got married and had a baby. “He saved me,” she said of her son. I know this is probably not the original intended meaning, but shows how scripture can be rich with different meaning in different contexts … just some food for thought.
Everything this person said is ridiculous. They try to use what they think was happening during the time period and what they think the traditions were and why Saul was stating this. They are merely speculating and assuming. I myself will read the words and assume the Divine put them there for me to understand them the way they are written. It makes sense to me. Women are easily deceived as was shown in the garden of Eden. Why would you believe someone who is so easily deceived. They should not talk because it could lead to problems like it led. Adam. This is very obviously a woman trying to make a reason so she can manipulate scripture.