What 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is Actually Teaching

 

I was asked the following question a few months back during my weekly “Ask Anything Wednesday” feature on my Instagram:

 “Can you help me with 1 Timothy 2:11-15? Does it indicate subordination of women? That doesn’t seem to align with the rest of the Bible?”  

First of all, major kudos to the lady who asked this question, as she already understands that a subordination of women does not align with the Bible’s teachings as a whole. That is a very important first place to start, because Scripture is to be used to interpret Scripture. We know from prior study that the Bible itself does not teach that women are subordinate. Therefore, this passage in 1 Timothy cannot be teaching that, either.

Now on to the passage itself!

11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. 12 And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. 15 Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.

A Lack of Education

In the time and culture in which Paul was writing, women were not being taught or trained theologically. They were not allowed to sit at the feet of the Rabbi to learn from him, right alongside the men (which makes Jesus’ treatment of Mary in Luke 10 so beautiful and revolutionary!) To teach a woman theology was frowned upon, and yet the first thing we see in this passage from 1 Timothy is that Paul WANTS the women to learn.  That is huge! Paul is certainly no chauvinist, despite what some might claim. – link to women in the ministries of post

So, first, here in verse 11, we have the Apostle Paul making the revolutionary proclamation that women are now to not only be allowed to learn theology, but are to be encouraged to do so. This amazing development, combined with the salvation and freedom women are finding in the good news of the Gospel, is leading to a great excitement among them (rightfully so – they are being respected and raised up as never before in this era!) As they get more and more excited, however, a problem begins to arise – the same problem we see Paul write about in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35,

The women should be silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak, but are to submit themselves, as the law also says. 35 If they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home, since it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.

Chaos in the Churches

There are two things happening here: women are wanting to learn, and women are wanting to teach, but there are also two subsequent problems taking place: these women are wanting to teach, but they have not first learned, and they are wanting to learn, but they are becoming disruptive in the church service in their attempts to do so.

The larger context of 1 Corinthians 14 finds Paul addressing the chaos, commotion, and lack of order found in the early church services – people are speaking in tongues with no interpreters present, women are calling out in the middle of the service asking questions, and there is no semblance of order, peace, or the quiet and calm required for people to truly learn.

This is clearly why Pauls says in 1 Corinthians 14 that women are not to speak in the church service (we will see more on that specific topic in a moment), as well as why he tells them to learn in silence in 1 Timothy 2:11.

Now we move on to 1 Timothy 2:12, “And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.”

Women Teaching Men – a Biblical Concept!

The issue at hand here is not whether or not Paul believes that it is appropriate for women to teach men (we will see in a moment that God ordained women to do just that throughout the Word, and Paul did, as well!). The issue at hand here is that because these particular women had never before been taught proper, orthodox doctrine, they were currently unfit to teach others. By becoming the teachers, these uneducated women would have led a lot of people astray. That is what you have Paul prohibiting here.

What you do not have is Paul prohibiting women from ever teaching men at all – if he were, he would be going against the rest of the Bible and even his very own writings elsewhere.

We know this because in Romans 16, for example, Paul praises woman after woman for co-laboring with him in the ministry. One of these women is Junia, who he describes as being “well known” among the apostles (see Romans 16:7).  Another woman Paul mentions by name and publicly praises is Priscilla, a woman whom Luke writes about in Acts 18:26, where he points out that Priscilla and her husband Aquila corrected the evangelist Apollos’ false doctrine.

Allowing Scripture to Interpret Scripture

When studying the Word as a whole to better understand Paul’s true meaning in 1 Timothy 2:12, we come to clearly see God using women to teach men in the Old Testament, as well. As I have pointed out before, God specifically chose a woman named Huldah (who was a prophetess and prophesying at the very same time as the more well-known prophet, Jeremiah), to be the one He sent King Josiah and his men to for them to learn from (see 2 Kings 22:13-15 and 2 Chronicles 34:21-23). 

What is so notable about the example of God specifically choosing to send King Josiah and his men to a woman is that, when you read the passage, these men were in need of someone to correctly understand, interpret, and teach them the newly-discovered book of the law (which scholars tend to think was Deuteronomy). God was literally tasking this woman, Huldah, with teaching men the Word of God. That is precisely what prophets do- proclaim the Word of the Lord, and other female prophets throughout the Word include Deborah, Miriam, Joel’s daughters, Philip’s daughters, and Anna.

Allowing Paul to Interpret Paul

In addition to the Word as a whole providing us with a beautiful picture of women freely teaching men the Word of God (and vice versa, of course!) Paul, in 1 Corinthians 11, sheds further light on what his actual intended meaning was in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 14. Paul writes, in 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 these words, “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head. But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, for that is one and the same as if her head were shaved.

The greater context of this chapter (and then chapter 14, as well, as mentioned above!) shows that Paul is referring to how things are to take place in a church gathering, while the phrase “every woman who prays or prophesies” reveals that Paul is assuming that it will be normative and expected, in fact, for women to do both of these things. Through both the Old and New Testaments, both, it is portrayed as normal for men to teach women and for women to teach men. Therefore, that practice is clearly not what is being prohibiting in 1 Timothy 2:12.

So what exactly is being prohibited in this 1 Timothy verse? Well, first of all, Paul is prohibiting uneducated, unqualified women from teaching men – because that would naturally lead to falsehood and perhaps even heresy. But another interesting thing to note in this verse that will enable us to better understand Paul’s point is his use of the specific Greek word he chose that has been translated “authority” in this verse. It is not the typical word he uses for “authority”. In fact, he uses this particular Greek word only this one time in the entire New Testament, and it means quite a bit more than simply “authority”. 

This Greek word is authenteō, and literally means:

  1. one who with his own hands kills another or himself

  2. one who acts on his own authority, autocratic

  3. an absolute master

  4. to govern, exercise dominion over one

 
What Paul is saying is that he does not want women (and he wouldn’t want men, for that matter!) to have a dictatorial rule over others. This is because Jesus taught that the Kingdom of God is about service and not “lording it over” someone else (see Matthew 20:25-27). refer to Rachel’s podcast episode Paul is warning here against the kind of reactionary conduct that can be so common among women when they have been subordinated for a long time and have now finally been freed. Paul wants women to be free to learn, but he does not want them to wield their new-found freedom as a weapon against their brothers. Truly, this Greek word used in 1 Timothy 2:12 is not saying that women cannot ever be in a position of any kind of authority over a man at any time, but that she must be careful so as to not “lord it over” someone.

Women More Likely to be Deceived?

Now moving on to verses 13 and 14! First Timothy 2:13-14 baffled me for the longest time, but I have uncovered some very interesting and informative things in my research that have proven very helpful for me.
 
Paul appears, at first glance, to be singling women out as the ones who are more prone to being deceived. But, here again, is where the practice of having Scripture interpret Scripture, is so helpful! This supposed singling out of women as being more easily deceived is not at all what Paul does elsewhere, in the only other passage where he refers back to the account of Eve’s being deceived in Genesis 3. In 2 Corinthians 11:2-4, he says this, 
 

For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he who comes preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or if you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted—you may well put up with it!

 
Paul is saying that he is afraid that just as the serpent deceived Eve in the garden, so, too, the minds of the believers at Corinth will be deceived and led away, as well. In this letter to the church at Corinth, Paul was writing to both men and women, meaning that he believes they are both are equally capable of being deceived. We see this fact proven throughout the Word where instances of both men and women being deceived are replete. We see it in our own daily lives, as well. So, Paul is not saying that women are more likely to be deceived.
 
With that being the case, precisely why then does Paul say what he says in verses 13-14?
 

Historical Context

This is, again, where historical and cultural context is absolutely fascinating and so helpful! In our day and age, many who hold to patriarchal viewpoints will take this passage to mean that Paul was setting up a hierarchy in the church, or was even trying to say that God had done so back in the garden. But this just isn’t the case.
 
What Paul is doing here is exactly the same as what he is doing in the very next verse, verse 15, as well – addressing a false cultural teaching.
 
In his day, there was a Gnostic doctrine beginning to go around which taught that Eve was actually the one created first and that Adam, meanwhile, was the one who was deceived. Paul is refuting this error by referring back to the true Genesis account. In his day, the early roots of the pagan heresy, Gnosticism, were just beginning to sprout up. These teachings were, essentially, merely the reactionary response (and complete antithesis) to the false teachings of patriarchy (but were, themselves, also false and extreme, much like reactionary teachings of our day tend to be!).
 
Gnosticism taught that God was a woman, that men were evil and lacking in wisdom, and so on and so forth. “God” was referred to as “Dame Wisdom” or “Heavenly Eve”. Patriarchy had pushed women down for so long that, now, in reaction to that wrong treatment, completely false belief systems were arising in an over-reaction to what had gone on before (much like secular feminism is today).
 
So, Paul is making the effort here in 1 Timothy 2 to do away with both Gnostic teaching and patriarchal teaching at the same time. When I realized that, this passage actually became one of my favorite passages in all of Paul’s writings! Because it is incredibly powerful when viewed in its true context. God’s design and view of women truly is beautiful. As was Paul’s.

Saved in Childbirth?

 
And now we come to verse 15, a verse that has left many a Bible student scratching their heads. It is the verse  people will wrongly handle in an effort to teach women that their worth is to be found in bearing children, and that a motherhood is a woman’s highest calling. This just simply is not what Paul is getting at here, however. 
 
15 Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.
Believe it or not, I actually get excited about this portion of the passage, because what you have in this verse is actually really neat if you, again, understand the historical and cultural context of when and where this portion of the Bible was written.
 
What is contained in this verse is actually some incredibly freeing and beautiful good news for women. What you have in verse 15 is a case of Paul writing to Timothy who was in Ephesus, the hub of worship for the goddess Artemis.
 
Artemis was the one worshipped as the goddess who would protect women during the process of childbirth. Naturally then, women in that day would do whatever they were told they had to do in order to appease her so she would continue to protect them.
 
The problem was that this created a lot of pain, grief, loss, worry, anxiety, and more for these women and their loved ones, because  no matter what they did, women were still dying in childbirth – even women who faithfully worshiped Artemis!
 
In 1 Timothy 2:15, Paul is being directly used by the Holy Spirit to encourage the women of Ephesus to instead look to Christ for hope and good news. He was telling these women that they no longer had to bend over backwards to attempt to appease Artemis so that their labors and deliveries would go off without a hitch. He was showing them the answer for their fears, their problems, and their needs – Christ! If they will continue in faith, love, and holiness, they will find that the Lord will take care of them. They no longer have to please a false goddess and just cross their fingers that everything will be ok. What a relief this must have been to the women of Paul’s day!
 

Conclusion and Recommended Further Reading

 
And now, we have come full circle. As we said at the beginning, so has been proven now – 1 Timothy 2 does not at all teach subordination of women. And neither does the rest of the Bible. Women were created by God as co-heirs, equals to one another, and image bearers, just as men were. Women are welcomed and encouraged to learn theology just as men are. Women are allowed to teach right and proper theology to their brothers and sisters-in-Christ just as men are. And women are dearly loved and cared for by God just as men are. What gloriously good news that is!
 
 
If what you have learned here today has left you intrigued and wanting to learn more, I encourage you to check out the following books:
 

Recommended Further Reading:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

4 thoughts on “What 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is Actually Teaching

  1. Thank you for this post! I especially like how you used the phrase “secular feminism” because many times the world does and says the wrong things and call it “feminism.” Looking at another person’s explanation of this passage eased my anxieties and helped me to understand a bit better. Again, thank you.

  2. Probably this article was written by a woman. But u r wrong. If people wrestle with Scripture that is so clear, what will happen if they come across books like Daniel and Revelation?
    It is the woman that was deceived, then Adam fell. This church of Laodicea which means people’s rights explains exactly what is going on. This explains why Christian marriages are failing.

    2 Timothy 3:1-7 KJV
    This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

  3. Thank you for your interesting interpretation. So important to check our cultural bias against the rest of scripture. I have another interpretation for this verse: it has been my experience that after incredible trauma, I experienced giving birth and loving and being loved by my baby son, as a kind of salvation. God saved my life and sanity by blessing me with this pure little angel, my son (now 16) was and is to this day my greatest joy and sunshine, my healing: he ‘saved’ me. God saved me through childbirth from despair by putting this baby in my life. Today I heard another woman use exactly those words. She shared how she was sexually abused as a little child, gang-raped as a young woman, but then by a miracle she got married and had a baby. “He saved me,” she said of her son. I know this is probably not the original intended meaning, but shows how scripture can be rich with different meaning in different contexts … just some food for thought.

  4. Everything this person said is ridiculous. They try to use what they think was happening during the time period and what they think the traditions were and why Saul was stating this. They are merely speculating and assuming. I myself will read the words and assume the Divine put them there for me to understand them the way they are written. It makes sense to me. Women are easily deceived as was shown in the garden of Eden. Why would you believe someone who is so easily deceived. They should not talk because it could lead to problems like it led. Adam. This is very obviously a woman trying to make a reason so she can manipulate scripture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *